Comments for Technology Tips & Tweaks http://www.jimlynch.com/blog Helpful tips to get the most out of your hardware and software Tue, 01 May 2012 19:31:31 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2 Comment on How to upgrade to Ubuntu 12.04 by Paulo Andrade http://www.jimlynch.com/blog/2012/04/26/how-to-upgrade-to-ubuntu-12-04/comment-page-1/#comment-37631 Paulo Andrade Tue, 01 May 2012 19:31:31 +0000 http://www.jimlynch.com/blog/?p=3251#comment-37631 But, be careful in case you are upgrading using internet and have other linux distro installed and are using Grub from it. The process will not work. Better produce a CD/DVD and install as usual. But, be careful in case you are upgrading using internet and have other linux distro installed and are using Grub from it. The process will not work. Better produce a CD/DVD and install as usual.

]]> Comment on Restore Application Window Menus in Ubuntu’s Unity by thom http://www.jimlynch.com/blog/2012/02/24/restore-application-window-menus-in-ubuntus-unity/comment-page-1/#comment-36989 thom Tue, 27 Mar 2012 00:12:56 +0000 http://www.jimlynch.com/blog/?p=3148#comment-36989 You have no idea how incredibly happy i am with this tweak !! THANK YOU!!! :-D You have no idea how incredibly happy i am with this tweak !!
THANK YOU!!! :-D

]]> Comment on Linus Torvalds Calls for GNOME Fork by Brian Masinick http://www.jimlynch.com/blog/2011/08/04/linus-torvalds-calls-for-gnome-fork/comment-page-2/#comment-32595 Brian Masinick Fri, 21 Oct 2011 20:33:50 +0000 http://www.jimlynch.com/blog/?p=1862#comment-32595 I don't even see Xfce as a "step down from GNOME 2". Perhaps there are more "actions" in the Object sense that you can do more readily in GNOME 2 than you can in Xfce, but to me, Xfce, in usability, beats KDE, GNOME 2, GNOME 3, and also LXDE, which is fine, but quite limited in its feature set (barely more than a Window manager, and that is why it is so fast). I can see why a developer would use Xfce. I am no longer a developer, but I still have development-like tendencies in the things I do and the tools that I use. Xfce is probably closest to CDE, and that is what I last used as a developer, and OSF/Motif before that. Both were very ugly in appearance, but pretty simple in design, and easy to modify. Early implementations of KDE had those qualities; Xfce still does. It is now attractive, yet still easy to get what you want out of it. I don’t even see Xfce as a “step down from GNOME 2″. Perhaps there are more “actions” in the Object sense that you can do more readily in GNOME 2 than you can in Xfce, but to me, Xfce, in usability, beats KDE, GNOME 2, GNOME 3, and also LXDE, which is fine, but quite limited in its feature set (barely more than a Window manager, and that is why it is so fast).

I can see why a developer would use Xfce. I am no longer a developer, but I still have development-like tendencies in the things I do and the tools that I use. Xfce is probably closest to CDE, and that is what I last used as a developer, and OSF/Motif before that. Both were very ugly in appearance, but pretty simple in design, and easy to modify. Early implementations of KDE had those qualities; Xfce still does. It is now attractive, yet still easy to get what you want out of it.

]]> Comment on Steve Jobs Resigns as Apple CEO by Warlok29 http://www.jimlynch.com/blog/2011/08/24/steve-jobs-resigns-as-apple-ceo/comment-page-1/#comment-32131 Warlok29 Thu, 25 Aug 2011 04:28:25 +0000 http://www.jimlynch.com/blog/?p=1873#comment-32131 I don't think Apple's reign as Czar of the tech world is over as he'll become the Vladimir Putin of Apple. A seemingly lesser role as Chairman, but just as influential (if not more so) than the CEO. I don’t think Apple’s reign as Czar of the tech world is over as he’ll become the Vladimir Putin of Apple. A seemingly lesser role as Chairman, but just as influential (if not more so) than the CEO.

]]> Comment on Linus Torvalds Calls for GNOME Fork by JD http://www.jimlynch.com/blog/2011/08/04/linus-torvalds-calls-for-gnome-fork/comment-page-2/#comment-32092 JD Tue, 16 Aug 2011 12:22:30 +0000 http://www.jimlynch.com/blog/?p=1862#comment-32092 I agree with Linus. Gnome 3 is a disaster. It might be okay for touchscreen devices (maybe), but it's not intuitive at all, and takes at least a couple of clicks extra to do almost anything. Numerous other issues with it too, but the bottom line is that I find it unusable, despite having tried to get used to it. It's not a productive environment in which to work at all. Have switched to XFCE, which I agree is not as polished as Gnome 2, but is vastly better than Gnome 3. I agree with Linus. Gnome 3 is a disaster. It might be okay for touchscreen devices (maybe), but it’s not intuitive at all, and takes at least a couple of clicks extra to do almost anything. Numerous other issues with it too, but the bottom line is that I find it unusable, despite having tried to get used to it. It’s not a productive environment in which to work at all. Have switched to XFCE, which I agree is not as polished as Gnome 2, but is vastly better than Gnome 3.

]]> Comment on Linus Torvalds Calls for GNOME Fork by Jeffrey http://www.jimlynch.com/blog/2011/08/04/linus-torvalds-calls-for-gnome-fork/comment-page-1/#comment-32067 Jeffrey Sat, 13 Aug 2011 18:05:56 +0000 http://www.jimlynch.com/blog/?p=1862#comment-32067 @Brandon You're correct, I'm using KDE 4.6 right now. I can't say I prefer it over gnome 2, I always found the latter to feel a little more lightweight, not to mention it works very very well without turning desktop effects on, I always found desktop effects to be something completely unnecessary. Oh well, KDE works for now, I am considering switching to openbox due to it's very lightweight feel. It will require some work though unfortunately @Brandon You’re correct, I’m using KDE 4.6 right now. I can’t say I prefer it over gnome 2, I always found the latter to feel a little more lightweight, not to mention it works very very well without turning desktop effects on, I always found desktop effects to be something completely unnecessary. Oh well, KDE works for now, I am considering switching to openbox due to it’s very lightweight feel. It will require some work though unfortunately

]]> Comment on Linus Torvalds Calls for GNOME Fork by Brandon http://www.jimlynch.com/blog/2011/08/04/linus-torvalds-calls-for-gnome-fork/comment-page-1/#comment-31982 Brandon Sun, 07 Aug 2011 21:01:50 +0000 http://www.jimlynch.com/blog/?p=1862#comment-31982 The UI metaphors used Windows, KDE (including KDE4), Gnome2, and Xfce may be a decade and a half old; but they work, and work well, for desktops and laptops. Gnome 3 looks like it was made for tablets and netbooks. I have tried Gnome 3 and Unity on Ubuntu, but I couldn't get used to it as easily as I have on KDE on Kubuntu. The UI metaphors used Windows, KDE (including KDE4), Gnome2, and Xfce may be a decade and a half old; but they work, and work well, for desktops and laptops. Gnome 3 looks like it was made for tablets and netbooks. I have tried Gnome 3 and Unity on Ubuntu, but I couldn’t get used to it as easily as I have on KDE on Kubuntu.

]]> Comment on Linus Torvalds Calls for GNOME Fork by Random Squires http://www.jimlynch.com/blog/2011/08/04/linus-torvalds-calls-for-gnome-fork/comment-page-1/#comment-31964 Random Squires Fri, 05 Aug 2011 18:44:33 +0000 http://www.jimlynch.com/blog/?p=1862#comment-31964 @AC: Please don't flame with infantile swearing (or at least if you do, please use the proper words - "fark", seriously?) If you'd read my comment, you'd have realised I was trying to offer a balanced (if slightly tongue-in-cheek) appraisal of Linus' complaints. I personally like Gnome 3, as is my right. I also recognise that it has many problems, such as not really supporting graphics cards without decent 3D linux drivers. In that way and others, I can see that Linus has a point and a reason to be frustrated. However, I stand by my comments: some of Linus' problems with Gnome 3 could have been avoided by him, as you might put it, "Reading the farking manual". @AC: Please don’t flame with infantile swearing (or at least if you do, please use the proper words – “fark”, seriously?)

If you’d read my comment, you’d have realised I was trying to offer a balanced (if slightly tongue-in-cheek) appraisal of Linus’ complaints. I personally like Gnome 3, as is my right. I also recognise that it has many problems, such as not really supporting graphics cards without decent 3D linux drivers. In that way and others, I can see that Linus has a point and a reason to be frustrated.

However, I stand by my comments: some of Linus’ problems with Gnome 3 could have been avoided by him, as you might put it, “Reading the farking manual”.

]]> Comment on Linus Torvalds Calls for GNOME Fork by naranha http://www.jimlynch.com/blog/2011/08/04/linus-torvalds-calls-for-gnome-fork/comment-page-1/#comment-31963 naranha Fri, 05 Aug 2011 18:28:14 +0000 http://www.jimlynch.com/blog/?p=1862#comment-31963 ... I meant "with great pleasure", sorry ;) … I meant “with great pleasure”, sorry ;)

]]> Comment on Linus Torvalds Calls for GNOME Fork by naranha http://www.jimlynch.com/blog/2011/08/04/linus-torvalds-calls-for-gnome-fork/comment-page-1/#comment-31962 naranha Fri, 05 Aug 2011 18:27:37 +0000 http://www.jimlynch.com/blog/?p=1862#comment-31962 @AC: "Gnome 3 is crap" must be why I've been using it for over half a year now without great pleasure. And I work on this machine (writing, programming, websites). Gnome 3 is revolutionary, but this revolution was long overdue. Windows, KDE, Gnome2, Xfce: They all use UI metaphors that are over a decade old. They just don't get any better. People are just to pigheaded to realize that. It might just take another decade. Heavy weight Desktops are the past. @AC: “Gnome 3 is crap” must be why I’ve been using it for over half a year now without great pleasure. And I work on this machine (writing, programming, websites). Gnome 3 is revolutionary, but this revolution was long overdue. Windows, KDE, Gnome2, Xfce: They all use UI metaphors that are over a decade old. They just don’t get any better. People are just to pigheaded to realize that. It might just take another decade.

Heavy weight Desktops are the past.

]]> Comment on Linus Torvalds Calls for GNOME Fork by AC http://www.jimlynch.com/blog/2011/08/04/linus-torvalds-calls-for-gnome-fork/comment-page-1/#comment-31961 AC Fri, 05 Aug 2011 18:15:42 +0000 http://www.jimlynch.com/blog/?p=1862#comment-31961 Re: Random Squire "Sorry, but this really IS a case where Linus just needs to RTFM." Fark you, you clueless moron. Gnome 3 is crap. It doesn't work in a sane manner, because the people building it are complete idiots with regard to UI. It's worse than useless. Re: Random Squire “Sorry, but this really IS a case where Linus just needs to RTFM.”

Fark you, you clueless moron. Gnome 3 is crap. It doesn’t work in a sane manner, because the people building it are complete idiots with regard to UI.

It’s worse than useless.

]]> Comment on Linus Torvalds Calls for GNOME Fork by naranha http://www.jimlynch.com/blog/2011/08/04/linus-torvalds-calls-for-gnome-fork/comment-page-1/#comment-31959 naranha Fri, 05 Aug 2011 13:23:33 +0000 http://www.jimlynch.com/blog/?p=1862#comment-31959 Honestly I think Gnome 3 rocks, because it gets rid of all the annoying things about windows manager and provides one simple intuitive way to handle your open windows. - Taskbar: Helpful if you have 3 windows open, that you can see on your desktop anyway. As soon as you have 5+ it gets full and it's hard to find anything. It even groups windows, which is even worse, because it takes more clicks to get to your target. Furthermore it takes up vertical space, especially when you add shortcuts and mini apps. - Desktop: Desktop Icons SUCK. They take up resources and are inaccessible when you have a couple of windows open. In Gnome 2 my desktops always ended up in chaos. The activities mode is much better because it not only displays your shortcuts but also your open windows and available programs. Switching to your Desktop just to start a program is insane. - Start menu: In Gnome 2 I rarely ever used the Start menu, mostly shortcuts. Nevertheless it took up 1/3rd of my Application bar. The organisation in Gnome 3 is much better, you can see more information in the full screen menu and it has a marvelous search function. Gnome 2 had more features, but most of the features were implemented poorly. Please, try Gnome 3 at least for a month at work and see how much efficiency you really gain. Honestly I think Gnome 3 rocks, because it gets rid of all the annoying things about windows manager and provides one simple intuitive way to handle your open windows.

- Taskbar: Helpful if you have 3 windows open, that you can see on your desktop anyway. As soon as you have 5+ it gets full and it’s hard to find anything. It even groups windows, which is even worse, because it takes more clicks to get to your target. Furthermore it takes up vertical space, especially when you add shortcuts and mini apps.

- Desktop: Desktop Icons SUCK. They take up resources and are inaccessible when you have a couple of windows open. In Gnome 2 my desktops always ended up in chaos. The activities mode is much better because it not only displays your shortcuts but also your open windows and available programs. Switching to your Desktop just to start a program is insane.

- Start menu: In Gnome 2 I rarely ever used the Start menu, mostly shortcuts. Nevertheless it took up 1/3rd of my Application bar. The organisation in Gnome 3 is much better, you can see more information in the full screen menu and it has a marvelous search function.

Gnome 2 had more features, but most of the features were implemented poorly. Please, try Gnome 3 at least for a month at work and see how much efficiency you really gain.

]]> Comment on Linus Torvalds Calls for GNOME Fork by TGM http://www.jimlynch.com/blog/2011/08/04/linus-torvalds-calls-for-gnome-fork/comment-page-1/#comment-31957 TGM Fri, 05 Aug 2011 07:58:34 +0000 http://www.jimlynch.com/blog/?p=1862#comment-31957 It's sad but both Gnome and KDE screwed up on their NG releases. Sad to say but Linux takes pride on not changing too much, so it's biggest two DEs decided it would throw a curveball at all of it's users. Just like the Windows platform a lot of us wanted to escape really. It’s sad but both Gnome and KDE screwed up on their NG releases. Sad to say but Linux takes pride on not changing too much, so it’s biggest two DEs decided it would throw a curveball at all of it’s users. Just like the Windows platform a lot of us wanted to escape really.

]]> Comment on Linus Torvalds Calls for GNOME Fork by Random Squires http://www.jimlynch.com/blog/2011/08/04/linus-torvalds-calls-for-gnome-fork/comment-page-1/#comment-31956 Random Squires Fri, 05 Aug 2011 06:57:19 +0000 http://www.jimlynch.com/blog/?p=1862#comment-31956 Sorry, but this really IS a case where Linus just needs to RTFM. Some of his criticisms are valid, but the bit about clicking on a programme icon on the left-hand dock only to find it brings up your existing window, not a new one? Anyone who took some time to read up about Gnome 3, because it was OBVIOUSLY going to be a substantially different experience, would have found that by right-clicking on an icon you can bring up a new window of an already-running app. If he wants to use Xfce that's fine, there are plenty of good reasons, but it feels distinctly like he's using his fame and massive influence simply as trolling-power. Sorry, but this really IS a case where Linus just needs to RTFM. Some of his criticisms are valid, but the bit about clicking on a programme icon on the left-hand dock only to find it brings up your existing window, not a new one? Anyone who took some time to read up about Gnome 3, because it was OBVIOUSLY going to be a substantially different experience, would have found that by right-clicking on an icon you can bring up a new window of an already-running app.

If he wants to use Xfce that’s fine, there are plenty of good reasons, but it feels distinctly like he’s using his fame and massive influence simply as trolling-power.

]]> Comment on Linus Torvalds Calls for GNOME Fork by lnxrlz007 http://www.jimlynch.com/blog/2011/08/04/linus-torvalds-calls-for-gnome-fork/comment-page-1/#comment-31951 lnxrlz007 Fri, 05 Aug 2011 03:18:27 +0000 http://www.jimlynch.com/blog/?p=1862#comment-31951 Fully agree. And while they are at it, PLEASE fix the bug that you cannot un-install Evolution from Gnome.... Fully agree. And while they are at it, PLEASE fix the bug that you cannot un-install Evolution from Gnome….

]]> Comment on My Jawbone Sucks! by moe k http://www.jimlynch.com/blog/2008/10/25/my-jawbone-sucks/comment-page-1/#comment-31480 moe k Wed, 29 Sep 2010 14:31:32 +0000 http://www.jimlynch.com/blog/?p=513#comment-31480 wish i read this prior to buying one of these... i have the exact same issue, i almost tossed the thing out of the car the other day (day 1 of use).. gonna give it another shot to see if i get used to it, else i am done w/ it.. wish i read this prior to buying one of these… i have the exact same issue, i almost tossed the thing out of the car the other day (day 1 of use).. gonna give it another shot to see if i get used to it, else i am done w/ it..

]]> Comment on Review: Xandros Desktop OS 3 Deluxe Edition by Paul Valley http://www.jimlynch.com/blog/2004/12/10/review-xandros-desktop-os-3-deluxe-edition/comment-page-1/#comment-31460 Paul Valley Sat, 25 Sep 2010 21:25:30 +0000 http://www.jimlynch.com/?p=290#comment-31460 will never touch Xandros after they signed up with M$ they are also not going to put any further work into it as agreed with M$ will never touch Xandros after they signed up with M$ they are also not going to put any further work into it as agreed with M$

]]> Comment on uTorrent for Linux by Aditi http://www.jimlynch.com/blog/2010/06/17/utorrent-for-linux/comment-page-1/#comment-31228 Aditi Fri, 18 Jun 2010 08:43:23 +0000 http://www.jimlynch.com/blog/?p=1046#comment-31228 Hey could you recommend a good torrent downloader for isadora. :) LInux mint 9. its awesome. and transmission doesnt do the trick. Im using deluge currently. and a GNOME package..:D Hey could you recommend a good torrent downloader for isadora. :)
LInux mint 9. its awesome. and transmission doesnt do the trick. Im using deluge currently. and a GNOME package..:D

]]> Comment on Tablets Powered By Linux by Jim http://www.jimlynch.com/blog/2010/06/12/tablets-powered-by-linux/comment-page-1/#comment-31210 Jim Mon, 14 Jun 2010 21:04:08 +0000 http://www.jimlynch.com/blog/index.php/2010/06/12/tablets-powered-by-linux/#comment-31210 Hi Randy, I agree, Flash sucks. See my column about it: http://jimlynch.com/index.php/2010/04/07/why-flash-sucks/ I'm seeing more and more HTML5 sites popping up. Or I should say sites that have switched to HTML5 or who are at least making their content available to iPad/iPhone users. Over time, hopefully folks on Linux won't care about flash at all. Hi Randy,

I agree, Flash sucks. See my column about it:

http://jimlynch.com/index.php/2010/04/07/why-flash-sucks/

I’m seeing more and more HTML5 sites popping up. Or I should say sites that have switched to HTML5 or who are at least making their content available to iPad/iPhone users.

Over time, hopefully folks on Linux won’t care about flash at all.

]]> Comment on Tablets Powered By Linux by Randy http://www.jimlynch.com/blog/2010/06/12/tablets-powered-by-linux/comment-page-1/#comment-31208 Randy Sun, 13 Jun 2010 22:21:26 +0000 http://www.jimlynch.com/blog/index.php/2010/06/12/tablets-powered-by-linux/#comment-31208 I'm not a huge Apple fan, but I do own a MacBook. At the same time, I have five PCs which all run different versions of Windows and Linux. I'm all for Apple's boycott of Flash. Flash itself is a proprietary format that needs to be replaced by HTML5 quick. I think Apple's arrogant Safari HTML5 site was only a proof of concept for the power of HTML5. Adobe recently stopped releasing the Linux 64-bit version of the Flash plugin. This means that in order for a 64 bit Linux user to watch use Flash, they have to find extremely hacked up work-arounds. The problem isn't that people are using 64-bit Linux. The problem stems from websites utilizing this proprietary format. I’m not a huge Apple fan, but I do own a MacBook. At the same time, I have five PCs which all run different versions of Windows and Linux. I’m all for Apple’s boycott of Flash. Flash itself is a proprietary format that needs to be replaced by HTML5 quick. I think Apple’s arrogant Safari HTML5 site was only a proof of concept for the power of HTML5.

Adobe recently stopped releasing the Linux 64-bit version of the Flash plugin. This means that in order for a 64 bit Linux user to watch use Flash, they have to find extremely hacked up work-arounds. The problem isn’t that people are using 64-bit Linux. The problem stems from websites utilizing this proprietary format.

]]> Comment on Movies Disappearing from the iTunes Store by srminton http://www.jimlynch.com/blog/2008/12/11/movies-disappearing-from-the-itunes-store/comment-page-1/#comment-31198 srminton Sat, 27 Mar 2010 01:49:43 +0000 http://www.jimlynch.com/blog/?p=756#comment-31198 This really is idiocy. Tonight I felt like watching Gladiator. First I tried iTunes - not available. Then Amazon. Then Netflix. So, wait......the ONLY way I can watch this movie tonight is to watch a pirate copy hosted in China.....well, smart move, Hollywood....that's like saying, hey you love Cheese Balls, but we don't want to sell them to you in the grocery store right now, because we're selling them in the mall which is forty miles from where you live and only opens on Tuesdays, so the only way you're getting cheese balls is to steal them from the warehouse around the corner which leaves the doors unlocked all night. Well great. Thanks. I will. :tongue: This really is idiocy. Tonight I felt like watching Gladiator. First I tried iTunes – not available. Then Amazon. Then Netflix. So, wait……the ONLY way I can watch this movie tonight is to watch a pirate copy hosted in China…..well, smart move, Hollywood….that’s like saying, hey you love Cheese Balls, but we don’t want to sell them to you in the grocery store right now, because we’re selling them in the mall which is forty miles from where you live and only opens on Tuesdays, so the only way you’re getting cheese balls is to steal them from the warehouse around the corner which leaves the doors unlocked all night. Well great. Thanks. I will. :tongue:

]]> Comment on Why Amazon Sucks and Why I Won’t Buy Any More Kindle Ebooks by Barnes and Noble eReader | iPhone App Reviews Blog http://www.jimlynch.com/blog/2009/07/18/why-amazon-com-sucks-and-why-i-wont-buy-any-more-kindle-books/comment-page-1/#comment-31197 Barnes and Noble eReader | iPhone App Reviews Blog Thu, 23 Jul 2009 16:53:12 +0000 http://www.jimlynch.com/blog/?p=886#comment-31197 [...] ebook app for the iPhone as competition usually brings out the best in all companies. And, given Amazon’s recent screw up in deleting books from people’s Kindles without getting permission, I think it’s a [...] [...] ebook app for the iPhone as competition usually brings out the best in all companies. And, given Amazon’s recent screw up in deleting books from people’s Kindles without getting permission, I think it’s a [...]

]]> Comment on Why Amazon Sucks and Why I Won’t Buy Any More Kindle Ebooks by Galactic Watercooler » Blog Archive » Big Brother Strikes The Kindle http://www.jimlynch.com/blog/2009/07/18/why-amazon-com-sucks-and-why-i-wont-buy-any-more-kindle-books/comment-page-1/#comment-31196 Galactic Watercooler » Blog Archive » Big Brother Strikes The Kindle Mon, 20 Jul 2009 17:39:03 +0000 http://www.jimlynch.com/blog/?p=886#comment-31196 [...] Think you bought a copy of Orwell’s 1984 or Animal Farm for your Kindle? Think again. This week in a move that would make George himself say “I told you so,” Amazon remotely deleted copies of these Orwell classics from hundreds of Kindles. Though Amazon credited buyers’ accounts for original purchase price, Kindle owners are rightfully pissed. [...] [...] Think you bought a copy of Orwell’s 1984 or Animal Farm for your Kindle? Think again. This week in a move that would make George himself say “I told you so,” Amazon remotely deleted copies of these Orwell classics from hundreds of Kindles. Though Amazon credited buyers’ accounts for original purchase price, Kindle owners are rightfully pissed. [...]

]]> Comment on Ten Reasons Why I Love Pluck On Demand (Page 2) by Ten Reasons Why I Love Pluck On Demand | Jim Lynch: Off the Top of My Head... http://www.jimlynch.com/blog/2008/11/20/ten-reasons-why-i-love-pluck-on-demand-page-2/comment-page-1/#comment-31179 Ten Reasons Why I Love Pluck On Demand | Jim Lynch: Off the Top of My Head... Sun, 23 Nov 2008 02:46:32 +0000 http://www.jimlynch.com/blog/?p=670#comment-31179 [...] Go to Page 2 of the Ten Reasons Why I Love Pluck On Demand [...] [...] Go to Page 2 of the Ten Reasons Why I Love Pluck On Demand [...]

]]> Comment on Ten Reasons Why I Love Pluck On Demand (Page 1) by Ten Reasons Why I Love Pluck On Demand (Page 2) | Jim Lynch: Off the Top of My Head... http://www.jimlynch.com/blog/2008/11/20/ten-reasons-why-i-love-pluck-on-demand/comment-page-1/#comment-31178 Ten Reasons Why I Love Pluck On Demand (Page 2) | Jim Lynch: Off the Top of My Head... Sun, 23 Nov 2008 02:45:56 +0000 http://www.jimlynch.com/blog/?p=656#comment-31178 [...] headline (note that if you’re reading this on the front page of the blog you’ll have to click here to load this blog entry up individually in a new [...] [...] headline (note that if you’re reading this on the front page of the blog you’ll have to click here to load this blog entry up individually in a new [...]

]]>